In the .pd you have to set the bounds to make it work again:

e.g. from:
#X msg 824 1204 ; seq_temp resize $1 ; seq_temp bounds 0 $2 $1 0 ; seq_temp xticks 2 1 1 ; seq_temp yticks 2 1 1;
#X msg 834 1705 ; delay_def_temp resize $1 ; delay_def_temp bounds 0 0.125 $1 -0.125 ; delay_def_temp xticks 2 1 1;

to:
#X msg 824 1204 ; seq_temp resize $1 ; seq_temp bounds 0 1 1 0 ; seq_temp xticks 2 1 1 ; seq_temp yticks 2 1 1;
#X msg 834 1705 ; delay_def_temp resize $1 ; delay_def_temp bounds 0 0.125 1 -0.125 ; delay_def_temp xticks 2 1 1;

this topic brought me the idea: https://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6533/error-graph-empty-bounds-rectangle
I used arbitrary values for the bounds, probably it should simply not be $n

@lacuna this was it, thank you!
thx @ddw_music and @willblackhurst too, will check your recommendations! : )

on calling an abstraction i want to be able to control data with a creation argument but overwrite with the inlets signal. not sure if this clears it up?

Hi, on abstraction creation there is the possibility to use arguments like "myptach 0.5". This is easy possible using control rate, but how about arguments regarding signal rates in combination with signal rate inlets? I don't seem to get it to work. Something like "mypatch~ 0.5". Can someone help?

Thank you : )

I'd just take Tom Erbe's allpass filter design from his reverb patches. https://tre.ucsd.edu/wordpress/?p=625

basically the title. I wonder how well it works with Pd. I assume lots of patching required such as for a normal MIDI controller?

looks nice! will look into this for my upcoming live set. Probably will switch the bob~ with a port of the gen-filters. : )

!! thank you

Pd Vanilla is only at version 0.56. Do you happen to use Purr Data?