-
lacuna
get number of channels in mc connections
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/1989missing/useful [snake~] methods
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/1996 -
lacuna
fastest and easiest, probably [env~].
or maybe this: https://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/13046/a-movable-autoconnnecting-vu-meter-esp-for-debugging-code
or some oscilloscope abstraction -
lacuna
@fishcrystals @mkdewolf
control rate [line] output updates every 64th sample
signalrate [line~] does continuous ramp on each sample -
lacuna
Indeed, stairs require lowered anti-aliasing filtering at the output.
But does always any DAC need filtering, even for sines below Niquist??
Hmmm here the stairs are in the human hearing-range....
-
lacuna
@JosephEoff @svanya take the multiband filter approach: https://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/10268/what-s-your-favorite-noisegate/6
-
lacuna
What would be a Vanilla replacement for [filter~]'s core ?
It doesn't have a help-file, I could only find the source with comments:
https://git.iem.at/pd/iemlib/-/blob/master/src/filter~.c?ref_type=heads
/* ---------- filter~ - slow dynamic filter-kernel 1. and 2. order ----------- */
It seems to have some interpolation algorithm to deal with the limited update rate of control-rate-only-inputs.
I don't need this, we can omit that, - just interested in what kind of filter is this?it has several modes:
lp1, lp2, hp1, hp2,
lp1c, lp2c, hp1c, hp2c,
ap1, ap2, ap1c, ap2c,
bpq2, rbpq2, bsq2,
bpw2, rbpw2, bsw2,
dlp1, dlp2, dhp1, dhp2,
dlp1c, dlp2c, dhp1c, dhp2c,
dap1, dap2, dap1c, dap2c,
dbpq2, drbpq2, dbsq2,
dbpw2, drbpw2, dbsw2And is used in many of IEMLIB's filters ...
Is this a biquad?
-
lacuna
Still a mystery why the send-method works? Anyone knows?
And still wondering what drowning in symbols means?In the extra spigot patch, you can get rid of [t a a] to maybe save some CPU cycles.
And maybe the send-method is cheaper than this. -
lacuna
[1 1, 0 0 5001(
rise till 1 in 1 ms, wait for 5000 ms then fall to 0 in 0 ms.
-
lacuna
one more demux, currently I think it is perfect:
And Zexy [mux] of course acts just the same, so no problem here. Nothing wrong with your example. @beep.beep