Hi i'm trying to recreate this algorithms with pd, my problem is that after creating the first route the second does not make noise, although the first route is disabled. (only one has control of the output signal)
Tried to use send and receive audio, but they even cant make sound

@zxcvbs Impossible to be sure unless you upload a zip file containing the whole patch.
It looks like [Operador] is an abstraction.
If that is the case and it contains [r $0-carrier] then the message from [s $0-carrier] is not received because the value of $0 is different in each abstraction and different to the value of $0 in the container patch.
David.

I think is something with catch and throw limitations.operadores.pd
I'm in the work, i could not connect it right here, or create default values but the main issues are once you have the two routes connected proprerly, it will sound in just one of them.
Perhaps i have to use tabosc4 or sinesum, do you have any basic examples to use with fm, i found https://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/10745/3-op-fm-synth-with-mod-matrix/3 but is over my head

@zxcvbs Lots of "multiply defined" warnings...... but because you have all those extra ones on the main page.
If I ......
Turn up the volume....... top left.
Turn on dsp and the volume bottom left.
Send a frequency into [s $0-carrier].
Turn on [pd algo2] by clicking the toggle.
Adjust the ratio and modulation and turn on the operador...s .......
It works perfectly on my computer.
The monitor works too when I turn that on..... very nice....!

As you posted it is D>C>B>A and working,
David.

I'm using purr data, my problem is that only one route works if i select the other there is no sound.
I have to manually delete the route that sounds to hear the other.
In the patch i have
D>C>B>A and D+C>B>A

@zxcvbs Untested, but should be good......... op.pd
[s~] [r~] can only have one [s~].
[throw~] [catch~] can only have one [catch~].
That was maybe the problem.

I have built you a matrix inside [pd algo2]
Look inside at [pd matrix] and I have built 2 messages for algo1 and algo7.
You will easily be able to build the others.
I think this is the easiest way although in extended you could use [matrix~ 4 5].
Anyway, I hope that is good for you.
The 0.5 values are because you are adding 2 outputs together in algo7, but that might be wrong for you and maybe they should also be "1".
You could add some logic to decide on "0.5" or "1" depending on whether operators are actually on or off.
David.

hi @whale-av i really thank you, i was stuck on this.
Meanwhile here is the rest of the algorithms 1.pd
i will upload the rest of the patch when i finish the other modules.
Something curious is happening with purr data, this patch is not working, most of the algorithms sound the same.
But in extended, it is working properly.

@zxcvbs Maybe @jancsika can help you with why Purr Data is not behaving in the same way?
David.