• jamcultur

    @whale-av The bat file does open the patch, but it doesn't open a new console window like I saw previously, and I only see one pd in the Windows Task Manager. Also, the patch is able to access audio and MIDI without changing the settings. Do you know if there is a way to verify whether Windows is running the patch in a different thread?

    posted in technical issues read more
  • jamcultur

    @whale-av Thanks for the info! I'll try using a bat file to run multiple patches. My main patch does all the audio and MIDI I/O, so I think it should work as along as I start the main patch first.

    Since the current behavior is inconsistent, I'm wondering if I should open an issue on GitHub. Maybe it's a bug.

    posted in technical issues read more
  • jamcultur

    Sometimes when I double click on a patch to run it on Windows, it starts a second instance of Pure Data 0.56.0. Pd opens a second console window, and all messages from the second patch go to the second console window. Why does this only happen some times? Is there a way to make it happen all the time? Do different instances run in different threads? When I get a second instance of Pure Data, it is unable to connect to my MIDI device. Are there other restrictions on multiple instances of Pure Data?

    I've been looking at using [Pd~] to run different patches in different threads, but it would be easier to run each patch in a different instance of Pure Data, if there's a way to consistently start multiple instances.

    I don't remember seeing this before 0.56.0. Is it a new feature?

    posted in technical issues read more
  • jamcultur

    @FFW said:

    EDIT: you stack computation branch and they are released deepest to shallowest so numbers are reverted.

    I don't understand your comment. Why aren't the numbers coming out in the order in which they were computed? This seems like a bug to me. Is this behavior documented?

    posted in technical issues read more
  • jamcultur

    @FFW I had the control flow correct in my example. Adding [trigger] didn't fix the problem. Here's my example with [trigger]. The numbers incremented in the [i] object still come out in the wrong order. It appears that they are coming out in LIFO order when they should be coming out in FIFO order.

    loop_test.pd

    posted in technical issues read more
  • jamcultur

    I'm trying to increment two sets of numbers in a loop. One set comes out in the correct order; the other comes out in the reverse order. How can I make this work correctly? I've attached a simplified patch that demonstrates the problem. It should print
    0 0
    1 1
    2 2
    3 3
    4 4
    Instead it prints
    0 4
    1 3
    2 2
    3 1
    4 0

    loop_test.pd

    posted in technical issues read more
  • jamcultur

    Have you set Input Devices in Audio Settings?

    posted in technical issues read more
  • jamcultur

    @whale-av Thanks! That gives the syntax of -mididevout, but doesn't give enough information for me to understand what it does. What does
    -audiooutdev 1,3
    actually do?
    Does specifying it in Setup->Preferences as described in this post
    https://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/2980/more-midi-output-device-options-needed/4
    change the behavior of the device list in MIDI settings?

    posted in technical issues read more
  • jamcultur

    I'm having issues with using multiple MIDI devices. I think the -mididevout option might help, but I can't find any doc on it other than what's in this post:
    https://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/3582/how-to-specify-the-midi-channel

    Where can I get the specifics on how -mididevout works?

    posted in technical issues read more

Internal error.

Oops! Looks like something went wrong!