• Rachitic dada

    thank you very much! so the later bang in t b b will wait all calculation to be done with the first?
    I'm having a big problem with one of my midi devices, which name finishes by eight spaces, and i can't route it, even with \\\\. as it ends with spaces, i think it confuses route object. I tried to change its name via windows but it's even more upsetting and inefficient. Any ideas? i will search answers to that and post them here if found, except if it's too much out of topic.

    posted in technical issues read more
  • Rachitic dada

    Thank you @whale-av ! i did this little patch where you have to enter the names of your midi devices, in the order you want them in the midi settings. I have to test it on other configurations to see if it works properly. I'm unhappy with the pipe objects but that was seemingly the best option to avoid double triggering, or missing info in the pack ffff... route object don't seem to bang its outputs from right to left.

    I also struggle to install mediasettings, and i currently have to open the midi-settings-help patch to get pd to acknowledge midi-settings object. Sorry for the noobism!

    hope this will help others someday, if this does work reliably it's a big step forward for me, to be able to use pd in live configurations with many midi devices. In case of a bug/crash it's gonna save some time and stress !

    brouillon midi settings.pd

    PS you might also wanna adjust the [ 4 6 ( message at the end of the instruction sent to pd. i don't know what i t means but i noticed it was there every time i printed midi settings, so i put it. if anyone knows...

    posted in technical issues read more
  • Rachitic dada

    Hello,
    I would like to get puredata to place midi devices in the same order at startup, or at project startup. I already made [ pd midi-dialog ( messages with some success, as long as you keep your usb midi devices plugged the same way. This is when it gets frustrating, as pd or windows rearranges midi devices randomly when you unplug them and replug them between sessions. As i use pd on a laptop, i unplug midi devices often to do other stuff than puredata with it. i would like puredata to use the same midi devices and placed in the same order in the midi dialog, to make [ pd midi-dialog( messages relevant. Don't know if i'm clear, thanks for reading!

    Paul

    posted in technical issues read more
  • Rachitic dada

    Hi everyone, i'm trying to send a polyphonic (11 voices) midi note out to a midi automated flute. Each note of the flute is the result of a unique combination of closed and open holes, so i have to refresh the status of every 11 holes for each note.

    The abstraction i'm using works relatively fine (sometimes but rarely, pd freezes when i use it) but when i use it with DSP on, and pd as a dsp insert for other instruments i use, it crackles at each note played.

    I had the same problem with a sorting abstraction. Using a better made one using lists solved the problem. So i hope it can be done better.

    Here is the abstraction i currently use: noteoutflute.pd

    I multiplied triggers to be sure everything is done in the correct order, however i suspect that so many bangs is causing audio crackles.

    I tried to connect all the note out messages to the same noteout object but it doesn't work at all (???)

    Should I try with a list, an array, and/or midi out object instead of noteout? I'm kinda lost.

    Thanks for reading this too long of a post!

    Paul

    posted in technical issues read more
  • Rachitic dada

    @whale-av I decided to erase every .reg file out of frustration, and pd vanilla 64 bit works again, taking 0 to 2% of cpu ! metro object sounds precise enough to my ears so i won't try to mess with -nosleep and such. If I come across the right .reg file to erase, so pd doesn't forget every preference, i will up this post with the info. Thanks again!

    Paul

    posted in technical issues read more
  • Rachitic dada

    Hi everyone, first post here, this forum and great community already helped me a lot, thanks !!

    I'm stuck with this problem:

    when i launch puredata, it uses 25% of cpu, which corresponds to one full cpu core (!!!)

    I tried with or without -rt, -nosleep, -sleepgrain <1>, blocksize <64>, it doesn't change anything (i use these tags to increase precision in timers, delays and metros)

    I tried reinstalling it, i tried it in 32 bits, i tried it in different priority modes with windows task manager.

    i tried with pd-extended and no problem! 0 to 2% cpu usage with dsp off, even with fat midi patches...

    ...but the metro object in it is erratic (skips some beats !), contrary to vanilla's, so i'm currently stuck with a cooking-egg hot and howling fan laptop.

    Anyone encountered this problem?
    any help would be much appreciated!!

    Paul

    posted in technical issues read more

Internal error.

Oops! Looks like something went wrong!