-
-
MDobleZ
I'm sure there is something I'm doing wrong but this takes a whole second to refresh.
-
MDobleZ
Sorry, @bocanegra, I meant [bp~]. I'll try what you suggest. Thanks.
-
MDobleZ
No, @seb-harmonik.ar, I was using [tabwrite~] with the name of the array; but I assuming it will be the same thing. I know that with [pb~]s you can add a message and write the array index you want with no need for bangs (none triggered by the user at least), and I was wondering if that was somehow possible with the [rfft~] object.
-
MDobleZ
Is there another way to pass the numbers from [rfft~] to an array without using [tabwrite~]? I find [tabwrite~] makes the spectrum unstable (maybe something to do with the relationship between the number of bangs and the sampling frequency ... or maybe something else.)
-
MDobleZ
Solved! The problem was apparently you cannot connect [pd~] directly to a message; it has to go through an [env~] first. Thanks, @whale-av.
-
MDobleZ
I have 6 [bp~]s and I want each of one to be represented by a different column in the array going from low to high with the frequency.
-
MDobleZ
Is it possible to pass numbers from a [bp~] to an array using Pd-vanilla? I'm assuming it should be, but all the examples I find are for Pd-Extended and they don't work with vanilla.
-
MDobleZ
I eventually found out what the problem was; neither {sigmund~} nor any other pitch-tracking object are really vanilla objects. I still haven't found a solution though, so any help will be appreciated.
-
MDobleZ
Now I've tried writing the numbers in an array and still, although it works within the patch and although I'm using a readArray function which is almost identical to the one I'm using to read the other array, I'm getting nothing.