• barbouze

    @Nicolas-Danet said:

    "The idea behind Spaghettis" is to clean the code of Pure Data in order to improve it.

    This is a noble task :). Have you considered sharing those improvments to Pd, Purr Data or LibPd with merge requests? Why not contributing to those projects instead? Not criticising, just asking :sweat_smile:

    posted in news read more
  • barbouze

    Thanks a lot! :)

    posted in news read more
  • barbouze

    While waiting for the Pd 0.49 stable release and Purr data 2.6, I found pd-faust. How does faustgen~ differ from this external?
    On another topic, Purr data is now supporting 64bits floats. As Faust can already do this, is there any particular thing to set in faustgen~ so it is aware of this new feature?

    posted in news read more
  • barbouze

    This is great! Thanks a lot!
    I havn't tried it yet and won't be able to do so in the next few weeks but as far as I know, Faust can't work with multiple sample rate. Is it possible to circumvent this by putting a faustgen~ into a subpatch with a different sample rate?
    Like doing 8x antialiasing on a faust filter by upsampling/filtering/downsampling?

    posted in news read more
  • barbouze

    Great, thanks a lot! :)

    posted in technical issues read more
  • barbouze

    Sorry to bother you again, @nau, but, if you still have it could you please post your patch here, the sendspace link is dead :(

    posted in technical issues read more
  • barbouze

    @whale-av
    Well, I didn't think of using [env~] this way but theoretically this could work (and be computationally expensive) if:

    • I set [block~] in a way that it produce 64 blocks sent per block received, with each block sent delayed by one sample. Would that be [block~ 64 64 1], [block~ 64 64 64] or [block 4096 64 64]?
    • [env~ 64] could then process the average of those 1 block/64 samples received and at the same time keep up at sample rate as it is under heavy fire then I could use [snapshot~] to get the polarity right, as [env~] only sends [0-1]. Not sure if this would be nice to hear though.

    Anyway, I think it's time for me to let go the rule I set for myself about vanilla only/no externals as there is exactly what I need in cyclone with [buffir~] :sweat_smile:

    Thanks for your insight!

    posted in technical issues read more
  • barbouze

    Hi!
    I would like to create an averaging filter that takes the last x samples and output their mean/average value.
    Can this be done in vanilla?
    Would the overlap factor of block~/switch~ be usefull? (What is its use generally speaking?)
    Is there a way to run this filter with the use of a gaussian or another arbitrary curve to calculate the average output?
    Any help welcomed! :)

    posted in technical issues read more
  • barbouze

    @whale-av , I knew about Camomille but thought of something different from the words used ^^'

    posted in news read more
  • barbouze

    @EEight said:

    [...], so that it is possible to make plug-ins of various sorts out of Pd and they can coexist with each other. This will allow people to write much better VST plug-ins in Pd.

    Maybe I've missed something but how can you "write VST plugins in PD"? Is there a tool to convert PD patches into native VST plugins?

    posted in news read more

Internal error.

Oops! Looks like something went wrong!