• alexandros

    @ddw_music you're right about the right outlet. The left outputs a bang when [phasor~] rises above 0.5. My bad.

    posted in technical issues read more
  • alexandros

    Am I missing something, or the patch below isn't correct?

    [phasor~ 1]
    |
    [threshold 0.5 10 0.5 10]
    |
    [o]
    

    This does output a bang whenever [phasor~] resets.

    posted in technical issues read more
  • alexandros

    @whale-av since @_ish wants to get a bang, that will happen at block boundaries anyway, so why using [phasor~] is not accurate? You can use it combined with [threshold~] which takes in a signal and outputs a bang. If one wants to do stuff in the signal domain only, then bangs are not the way to go, and Pd's native objects don't really support such operations. I have compiled some externals that send trigger signals when a threshold is crossed. These signals are just a 1 surrounded by 0s, sent as a signal instead of a control message, but I'm not aware of a vanilla where way this is possible.

    posted in technical issues read more
  • alexandros

    @popomimi Can you show the Arduino code and the Pd patch you're using?

    posted in technical issues read more
  • alexandros

    Just throwing this here, in case it helps, as I haven't done stuff with Cepstral processing. FluCoMa includes a Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients object, but I think that's all. You can have a look though, as it includes a bunch of other stuff for analysis and processing. https://www.flucoma.org/

    posted in patch~ read more
  • alexandros

    The problem with the facebook group is that nothing is properly archived there. If you post a question here or the mailing list, it will be archived and others can look it up. The same way, you can look up the forum or mailing list to see if what you want to ask has already been answered.

    posted in patch~ read more
  • alexandros

    I'm no filter expert, plus you don't provide your equations, so I can't really tell. I have built though a vanilla abstraction that produces various filter types, including a notch one. You can test it and open it to read the resulting coefficients. It's either [omniFilter_abs~] or [multiFilter_abs~]. You can get it here https://github.com/alexdrymonitis/filter_abstractions

    posted in technical issues read more
  • alexandros

    I don't think Purr-data's installation will interfere with Pd, so you shouldn't need to uninstall it.
    If you have externals, as soon as you open your patch in vanilla, you'll get one error message per object that couldn't be created.

    posted in technical issues read more
  • alexandros

    @hansr you're right, that's what my abstraction is (it's actually a combination of two abstractions by Mike Moser-Booth into one, convinient abstraction). I'm no filter specialist, but what I know (which can be wrong) is that cascading filters adds their order, so what you state should be correct.

    posted in technical issues read more
  • alexandros

    Did you try vanilla? It's very easy to install externals through Tools -> Find externals (or Help -> Find externals on older Pd versions). You can install it with apt-get or compile from source (which is an easy process). It's more likely to work, I guess.

    posted in technical issues read more

Internal error.

Oops! Looks like something went wrong!