nice... and back to the topic too
but maybe you should use a function for the noise part which has a distribution function that doesn't focus so much on 1 and -1. like a triangle
i tried expr~ $v1*1+0*abs($v1) after the noise sin and think it sounds warmer
and maybe a second control to soften the generated noise at lower noise values

because nobody understands what i've written here i made a quit and dirty patch

http://www.pdpatchrepo.info/hurleur/sine2noise2.pd

@slur said:

i tried expr~ $v1*1+0*abs($v1) ...

Doesn't that just equal $v1?

Sounds cool, though.

@pulsed said:

My contrib

An fm-feedback voice

mvh

Very nice indeed... is there a way to make the sine to noise slider increase in more precise increments i.e. smaller units than just whole numbers.

Think this would give an even smoother transition from sine to noise.

number boxes and sliders can be shift dragged for finer grain resolution

mhv

@Maelstorm said:

@slur said:

i tried expr~ $v1*1+0*abs($v1) ...

Doesn't that just equal $v1?

Sounds cool, though.

damn this was the test equation.... i usually deleted *1+0
resulting in expr~ $v1*abs($v1)