-
pouk
hello everybody,
i made this very simple patch in order to mix several audio signal. each audio signal
is summed to his closest neighbor. so obviously when i decrease the volume of one source, it decrease the general volume of the output. how can i avoid that ?
so i would like to adjust the volume of each audio signal without deacreasing the general output. even if one track or more are at zero the master would be at a fixed full volume.thanks
-
pouk
hello everybody,
is there a limitation of inlet in expr box ? i try this and it doesn't work :
[expr $f1 + $f2 + $f3 + $f4 + $f5 + $f6 + $f7 + $f8 + $f9 + $f10]
it works up to $f9... -
pouk
hello,
i have a question. if i use a bandlimited sawtooth wave oscillator to make another waveforms, these latter will be anti aliased too ?
thanks
-
pouk
hello,'
if i send a message to a slider in which the range values are float, this slider output a wrong value. ex : if i send 1 to this slider it will output 1.004...
so the slider seems to subdivide the received value by a float. why ?
here a patch
thanks for your help
-
pouk
hello everybody,
i 've got some problem to make an abstraction which would smoothly fade from a
reverse sawtooth to a triangle and then to a sawtooth like in some analog synthesizer.
i know the J05.triangle patch but it doesn' t give a very precise shape for the sawtooths form, it' s good for making a triangle wave. usually i use separate oscillator for each waveform but i would like to make a single abstraction. i found a documentation about this subject on this pdf file :http://www.analoguesystems.co.uk/pdf/RS95-95E.indd.pdf
in fact i' m trying to make a classical shape control
can you help me ?
-
pouk
hello,
i recently discover the patch of maelstorm, phase-sync2.mmb.pd, it works very well and is very useful ! but i' ve got a problem, i don' t manage to make it work properly
under 1 hz. indeed if i choose a frequency of 0.8 for the master oscillo, the slave will
be false. maybe i make something wrong. here the patch.thank you
-
pouk
thank you for this patch it's exactly what i'm looking for !
it works perfectly ! now i have to study it.great
-
pouk
yes i am more interested by what you first described. i would like to maintain the volume at a certain db value for the master and so whatever the volume of each track.
thanks for your interest ! -
-
pouk
ok it' s out of my skill...maybe one day
so i give up for the moment...
Flipp i don' t understand, what is table condition ?thanks
-
pouk
i try to make a bandlimited triangle wave with slope control in order to choose between sawtooth and triangle. i' ve got some errors, a part of the signal stay without
being changed by the slope control. so the result is a triangle wave preceded and followed by a vertical line...
here the patch -
pouk
if i use a bandlimited sawtooth to make a square wave, can i choose duty cycle percentage without making aliasing ?
same question with triangle wave : if i change its slopes (reverse saw/tri/saw) aliasing will occur ? -
pouk
i was thinking about making a triangle wave or square wave from a bandlimited sawtooth wave.
-
pouk
i need several oscillators synchronized without little ramp
so if i take care about frequency ratio it works very well.
it was not very complicated...thank you !
-
pouk
ok ok so if i need two oscillators synchronized i must use for the slave a multiple frequency of the master. ex : osc master at 0.25 hz and slave at 2hz.
i must be careful with the frequency ratio and it will be synchronized, that' s it ? -
pouk
it' s strange...did you try with with the patch i uploaded, phaseSynchro.Quest.pd ?
i test it on an other computer and it' s the same. if i click on the message 0.8 the slave waveform begin to be wrong. we can see next two normal ramps cycles a little one and so on. here a snapshot of what happen under 1 hz. -
pouk
ok ok it' s very clear now i know who is s, t and x very useful ! great !
now i have to play with this new stuffMaelstorm, flipp thank you for your patience !
-
pouk
ok, i think the main problem is that i am not able to link the equation mentioned with pure data patch
"If we wish instead to specify the corner location (x, y) (with x in cycles, 0<x<1) we set s = y/x and t = y/(1-x). The DC value is y/2."
i learn a lot by looking on what happen on graph but i can' t manage to write these mathematic equation with pure data object. how can i write these equations with
boxes ? so i understand that x is the position of the corner and y is the amplitude. now if i want to change the position of the peak i need to change the slopes and if i change the slopes the amplitude increase or decrease...
so i tried to change the amplitude of the output of min~ according to the position of the peak in order to avoid low amplitude level. i know it doesn' t do what i want but
i do my best...:(here the patch
http://www.pdpatchrepo.info/hurleur/J05.triangleGalereWidth.pd
-
pouk
i don' t know if i understand everything. so what you say malstrom looks like something i did yet. indeed my first attempt in J05.triangle.pd was to fix a constant
for up control at 0.5 and to put a slider for down control between à an 1. if you look on the graph you will see that sawtooth got a very slow amplitude when you reach it.
in my school there are some users of reaktor and they say to me that what i am looking for is a kind of width control (name in reaktor). it looks like a symetric control like a PWM for a square wave. for example at a duty cycle of 50% your square wave is symetric. i' m looking for something like it but for a sinewave and a triangle wave.
we can find an illustration of what i am talking about at the end of p.49 and end of p.50 in the pdf that i mentionned in my first post. -
pouk
whaou i' m a bit lost...i don' t understand how to write it in pure data. i' ve got
a low level in mathematic knowledge...please can you schematize it ? mabe i will be
able to transpose it in pure data and then understand what happen.thank you