I tried to make a leslie, but failed.
This is what i (somehow) ended up with:
-
Leslie attempt
-
It IS nice.
Also, there is a new object for me [svf~], what is it's purpose? I cannot open it's help file. I assume it is some kind of filter, but I'd like to learn more about it. When I disconnected them, I got rid of the clicks which I'm not sure whether they are intentional or not. I also shortened the time it takes to catch the desired speed of rotating speaker because it seemed a little to long to me.
Anyway, very nice patch. Thank you for that.
sinewave -
I like the clicks. Good patch (once again).
-
[svf~] stands for State Variable Filter and is a low, high, band, notch filter with resonance. Left input is for the audio source, middle is for the cutoff frequency and the left is for resonance.
I love that filter! The clicks is on purpose as some sort of static noise (or something).I would be very happy to see someone making a leslie effect that sounds "right".
-
[svf~] does have the disadvantage of having a limited cutoff range, though. Those filters get unstable at high cutoff frequencies.
-
@Maelstorm said:
[svf~] does have the disadvantage of having a limited cutoff range, though. Those filters get unstable at high cutoff frequencies.
What filter do you recommend?
-
It just depends on what your needs are. I didn't mean to imply that you shouldn't use [svf~]; I was just pointing that it has some limitations. If you don't need the cutoff to go above about 1/4 the sampling rate, then [svf~] will work okay. State-variable filters have the nice advantage of providing different filter types with less processing, because the output of one type is used to help define another type. They sort of share resources, in a way. But the disadvantage comes in its range due to stability issues. The difference between 1/4 the sampling rate and 1/2 (which is Nyquist) is only an octave, anyway, and much of that is out of the range of most people's hearing.
