The problem is the fact that D05 has two instances of the D02.adsr abstraction, but the instances use the same remote message without the unique $0 identifier.
So to fix, just change "s line" to "s line-$0" and similar for receive objects.

I found an unresolved post from 13 years ago that references the same issue:
https://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/5058/problem-with-d05-envelope-pitch-pd
But rather than try to necro that post, figure I'll make a new post. Is this just me? Am I missing something? Should we update the doc examples?

Cheers,
-Michael

PS: The doc/examples are super helpful, and the only reason I know about the $0 thing at all is from doc/2.control.examples/13.locality.pd

The problem is the fact that D05 has two instances of the D02.adsr abstraction, but the instances use the same remote message without the unique $0 identifier.
So to fix, just change "s line" to "s line-$0" and similar for receive objects.

Good catch!

Devs don't necessarily follow the forum very closely, so an "unofficial" bug report here might not get noticed.

Bug reports on github are likely to get attention faster.

Pull requests -- proposing a concrete fix in a format that can be merged in easily -- would fix it even faster --

So I just did that: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2247

hjh

I just installed from source, so maybe, just maybe, next time I'll venture out and submit my own Pull Request.

just to note that you can send PRs directly to the "documentation" branch in the Pd repository, see https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/tree/documentation

or open issues at https://github.com/pure-data/pddp

cheers