I've been having quite a bit of fun with the rj library (https://puredata.info/downloads/rjlib), but have found some patches like u_highpassq contain the use of [list] inside them. Normally this wouldn't be a problem, but I kind of need to be able to compile my patch using the heavy compiler (https://github.com/enzienaudio/hvcc), and the heavy compiler does not support [list] for some strange reason.

The reason I kind of need to use the heavy compiler is because that's what https://www.rebeltech.org/patch-library/ uses. I have one of their devices, and I want to load a patch onto it that contains the high pass filter mentioned previously.

Alternatively, if anyone knows of a good vanilla (not extended) resonant low pass / resonant high pass filter patch that I could use instead of the rj one then that'd be great. I'm surprised pd doesn't have something like this in vanilla by default. Thanks

The heavy library can definitely do normal lists like [1 2 3( , it's specifically the [list] object that it doesn't like. In the patch in question, [list] has no arguments. Since posting this, I found http://write.flossmanuals.net/pure-data/lists/, and it says that [list] simply prepends a "list" symbol to any list it receives. If that's true then perhaps I can just do the same manually.

I have no idea why heavy does not have the [list] object, it's a strange omission / limitation

You can replace it with a message that is overwritten with the [set( directive like that:

This should work especially if all entries in the list are numbers. If symbols are involved, some care must be taken. This only works if the length of the list is fixed.

There are some limitations, but things are mostly working: https://github.com/Wasted-Audio/hvcc/pull/381/changes

We could really use some nice examples to try with this!