<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Reducing block size to reduce delay of send~&#x2F;receive~]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I'm trying to make an abstraction that toggles between 1 and -1 at audio rate whenever its input decreases, so I came up with this:<br />
<img src="/uploads/files/1574438462712-toggler.jpg" alt="toggler.JPG" class="img-responsive img-markdown" /><br />
I reduced the block size in the hope that it would reduce the delay of send~/receive~ to 32/44100 seconds, but I'm getting the following errors:</p>
<p>receive~ 1011_nextVal: vector size mismatch<br />
sigsend 1011_nextVal: unexpected vector size</p>
<p>I was lead to believe this should work from the [block~] help file:</p>
<p>&quot;Patches using send~/receive~ or throw~/catch~ to intercommunicate must have the same blocking -- and if their parents are blocked bigger than they are, there might be weirdness.&quot;</p>
<p>Am I doing something wrong?</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/12459/reducing-block-size-to-reduce-delay-of-send-receive</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 11:04:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/12459.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:09:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Reducing block size to reduce delay of send~&#x2F;receive~ on Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:09:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I'm trying to make an abstraction that toggles between 1 and -1 at audio rate whenever its input decreases, so I came up with this:<br />
<img src="/uploads/files/1574438462712-toggler.jpg" alt="toggler.JPG" class="img-responsive img-markdown" /><br />
I reduced the block size in the hope that it would reduce the delay of send~/receive~ to 32/44100 seconds, but I'm getting the following errors:</p>
<p>receive~ 1011_nextVal: vector size mismatch<br />
sigsend 1011_nextVal: unexpected vector size</p>
<p>I was lead to believe this should work from the [block~] help file:</p>
<p>&quot;Patches using send~/receive~ or throw~/catch~ to intercommunicate must have the same blocking -- and if their parents are blocked bigger than they are, there might be weirdness.&quot;</p>
<p>Am I doing something wrong?</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/12459/reducing-block-size-to-reduce-delay-of-send-receive</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/12459/reducing-block-size-to-reduce-delay-of-send-receive</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jameslo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:09:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Reducing block size to reduce delay of send~&#x2F;receive~ on Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:52:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I have to say....it's remarkable how often I find the answer to my question while composing it or within minutes of posting it.  Apparently send~/receive~ doesn't work at block sizes other than 64, and one should use tabsend~/tabreceive~ instead.  Not sure how I stumbled across <a href="https://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/6185/feedback-fm-algorithm" rel="nofollow">this post</a> from 8 years ago.  I do think the [block~] help file is misleading though.</p>
]]></description><link>http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/12459/reducing-block-size-to-reduce-delay-of-send-receive/2</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/12459/reducing-block-size-to-reduce-delay-of-send-receive/2</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jameslo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:52:07 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>